Rivalry Over Service Supremacy- The Tensions Between Myanmar’s Police and Military Forces
Service rivalry between the Myanmar police and military has long been a contentious issue in the country. This competition for power and influence has had profound implications for the governance and stability of Myanmar, often leading to conflicts and tensions that affect the daily lives of its citizens. Despite the fact that both entities are tasked with maintaining law and order, their differing priorities and approaches to security have created a complex power dynamic that continues to shape the political landscape of Myanmar.
The roots of this rivalry can be traced back to the country’s colonial past, when British rule divided the police and military forces into separate entities. Over time, these two institutions have developed distinct cultures, ideologies, and loyalties, which have contributed to their ongoing competition. The police, traditionally seen as a civilian force, are responsible for maintaining public order and enforcing laws, while the military, with its strong nationalist roots, has historically played a significant role in the country’s politics and governance.
One of the primary sources of contention between the two forces is the allocation of resources and authority. The military, having a long history of involvement in politics, often enjoys disproportionate power and influence over the country’s affairs. This has led to a situation where the police are often overshadowed by the military, both in terms of budget allocation and operational autonomy. As a result, the police have struggled to effectively carry out their duties, leading to a perception among the public that they are weak and ineffective.
Moreover, the rivalry between the police and military has been exacerbated by the presence of various ethnic armed organizations (EAOs) in Myanmar. These groups, which seek greater autonomy or independence for their respective ethnic regions, have often clashed with both the police and military. In such situations, the two forces have sometimes found themselves at odds, with the military taking a more aggressive approach to counter-insurgency operations, while the police are often seen as more lenient and less confrontational.
The service rivalry has also had a significant impact on the rule of law in Myanmar. The military’s dominance in the political arena has led to a situation where the police are sometimes pressured to act in accordance with the military’s interests, rather than those of the civilian population. This has resulted in instances where the police have been accused of human rights abuses, such as arbitrary arrests, torture, and extrajudicial killings, particularly in conflict-affected areas.
In an effort to address the service rivalry and improve the overall security situation in the country, various initiatives have been proposed. One such initiative is the establishment of a joint police-military command center, which aims to foster better coordination and communication between the two forces. However, the effectiveness of such measures remains to be seen, as the deeply ingrained mistrust and competition between the police and military may be difficult to overcome.
In conclusion, the service rivalry between the Myanmar police and military is a complex issue with far-reaching consequences for the country’s governance and stability. As both entities continue to vie for power and influence, the well-being of the Myanmar people hangs in the balance. It is crucial for the government and relevant stakeholders to address this issue head-on, in order to ensure a more secure and prosperous future for all.
