Revolutionizing American Politics- The Impact of Citizens United on Citizen Engagement and Campaign Finance

How Has Citizens United Changed American Politics?

The Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) in 2010 has had a profound impact on American politics. This landmark ruling, which struck down a provision of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, has altered the landscape of political financing and campaign spending in the United States. This article explores the ways in which Citizens United has changed American politics, including its effects on campaign finance, the influence of money in politics, and the role of corporations in the political process.

Expansion of Campaign Spending

One of the most immediate and visible effects of Citizens United was the explosion of campaign spending. Prior to the ruling, corporations, unions, and other organizations were prohibited from using their general treasury funds to make independent expenditures in support of or opposition to candidates for federal office. Citizens United overturned this restriction, allowing these entities to spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns.

The floodgates of money into politics were consequently opened, leading to a significant increase in the amount of money spent on campaigns. Super PACs (Political Action Committees), which can accept unlimited contributions from individuals, corporations, and unions, have become a dominant force in American politics. This has led to concerns about the influence of money on the political process and the potential for corruption.

Influence of Money in Politics

The influence of money in politics has become a central issue since the Citizens United decision. Critics argue that the ruling has given wealthy individuals and corporations disproportionate power over the political process. They contend that this can lead to policies that favor the interests of the wealthy and powerful, rather than the interests of the general public.

Supporters of Citizens United, on the other hand, argue that the ruling has protected free speech and allowed for a more open and transparent political process. They contend that the decision has given individuals and organizations the right to express their political views without government interference.

Role of Corporations in the Political Process

Citizens United has also had a significant impact on the role of corporations in the political process. The ruling has allowed corporations to spend vast sums of money on political campaigns, which can give them disproportionate influence over the political process. This has raised concerns about the potential for corporate influence on public policy and the democratic process.

Moreover, the decision has sparked a debate over the definition of “personhood” in the context of campaign finance. Some argue that corporations, like individuals, have a constitutional right to free speech, while others argue that corporations are not people and should not have the same rights and protections.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Citizens United decision has had a profound impact on American politics. It has changed the landscape of campaign finance, increased the influence of money in politics, and raised questions about the role of corporations in the political process. While some argue that the ruling has protected free speech and allowed for a more open political process, others are concerned about the potential for corruption and the disproportionate influence of money and corporations. The debate over Citizens United continues to shape American politics, and its long-term effects remain to be seen.